Coca-Cola Life Review

Coca-Cola Life brings the fabulousness of true sugar with the grossness of Stevia, an all-natural diet sweetener more infamous for its bitterness than famous for its sugariness. But let us keep an unbiased mind and treat our eyes to the Pakistan green label, branded with uninteresting font chosen for elegance. Too many words are packed onto the tiny real-estate of the moss colored packaging.

A potent effervescence wakes up your palate, an unanticipated punch that is too sparkling for the drink's delicate insubstantialness. Life itself is considerably more intricate than this suggests, a tenuous body with insignificant innuendos of spices, only the dubious debuts of some canceled cinnamon and nullified nutmeg. The feisty carbonation demands more byzantine piquancy than the unsatisfying seltzer we sit sipping, instead left for dead with the deadened flavors of orange and vanilla. It is an unenthusiastic braiding, tastes holding hands but without motivation. With Coke using organic sweeteners, neither the citrus nor the vanilla are as complex as they should be. The bottle reads "natural flavors," but my tongue is not tasting them. All trepidation from Stevia's usual iniquity should be abated: every sip is painless and almost like its full-calorie cousin. It is not the obvious ersatz elixir expected when the argentate cap cracked open, but lacks the weight of a true sugared soda. It does not disappoint, but fails to ever wow.

Each bottle contains: water, forty grams of sugar, color, flavors, phosphoric acid, potassium benzoate, forty seven milligrams of caffeine, and Stevia. It hits almost a sweet spot between full and zero calories with its 160 per twenty ounces, but other than the natural sweetener its ingredient cocktail is pedestrian. As is everything else about.

official site

TaB Cola Review

There's no reason to discuss the history to the surprisingly still produced TaB cola, but with its ghost availability and general redundancy makes one really question the decision to keep this beverage available. Back in 1963, the colour pink certainly would stereotypically attract women, with the sexist thinking that this demographic would be the only to worry about wasting their waist, but presently it looks far too retro and barren to warrant even a passing glace outside one of curiosity. The background resembles the most basic of vintage wallpaper, or something of the such, and in all honesty it just doesn't look good. And the lack of any indication as to it being a cola is quite detrimental, as although it must have a fan base for it to be still brewed, it limits the growth of new consumers by avoiding clarification as to what genre of soda it belongs to.

Orange peel that's bitten by a sharp metallic tasting bitterness is what the first sip is described as. There's a stern of vanilla that's obstructed profoundly by the latter, however this alleviates one from really noticing its severe blandness and insipidity. There's a pleasantly present acidity and a surprisingly balanced sweetness, though it will never be mistaken for the real stuff. What is uncommon is that the experience doesn't taste as chemically hollowed as most, though the flavour is obviously fictitiously erected. Unfortunately though, the taste is all muffled prosaically together, and never does it become the least bit engaging, and it certainly grows more difficult to come closer to depleting the can in entirety. There aren't any moments when the profile depict any anticipated spices, such as cinnamon or nutmeg, though it is possible their presence is incapacitated. But by simply being more palatably delightful, TaB gets a recommendation over the drink that ultimately replaced it from Coca-Cola's prolific line up, but morosely it's wholly impossible for to once again be the little pink cola that could.

The sweetener that generated the slight aforementioned praise is of course saccharin, though it is bred with aspartame. Initially it used sodium cyclamate, but once banned the former was exploited, and it's use of the such is one of the few sodas that continue to do so, with the personal favourite braid of acesulfame potassium and sucralose becoming the desired synthetic sugars. In the end, TaB's obscurity, in both its scarce availability and public knowledge, censors the slight superiority it has over its popular younger brother Diet Coke.

official site

Diet Pepsi Vanilla vs. Coca-Cola Vanilla Zero

Both of the two prolific beverage companies almost always release their variety of the others' extension, whether it's an orange soda, caffeinated citrus energy soda, or flavoured cola. Some succeed and are remembered, but most are oft forgotten and replaced by some other similar tasting drink. And today we're going to compare the two big wigs vanilla based aberrations of their most known product.

Coca-Cola Vanilla Zero's can is wholly different from Diet Pepsi Vanilla's, almost as if they're trying to be opposite. One's white, the other is black, and the actual graphical characteristics conflict. Coke's cluttered design reminds me much of Moxie's modern insignia, which isn't exactly a compliment despite my enjoyment of the bitter Maine favourite. Pepsi's visual appearance takes a more modern approach then does Coke's, with sleek images of vanilla orchids and it's largely barren environment. The personally preferred can is obviously then of latter, even if neither can does much to excite me, and actually, the real kicker is the smoother name "Diet Pepsi Vanilla," opposed to the stumbling "Coca-Cola Vanilla Zero."

Diet Vanilla Coke, as it should be called, tastes of a poorly balanced vanilla injection into the classic cola flavour. There's no sense of creaminess as it battles across the tongue, only a harshly carbonated and improperly sweetened vanillin tinted fluid. It doesn't display any sort of depth, and instead of complementing the expected cola flavour it vapors over and chokes it from becoming actually detected. The Diet Pepsi Vanilla, on the other hand, goes for a cream soda inspired experience that's well crafted, especially compared to the former. The milkiness is thick and is initially just safe from being too rich, and the sweetness is defined and appropriately strong. The deeper flavour profile makes it far more pleasurable than it's counterpart, but both end up being quite a chore to fully finish, albeit for different reasons. Coke's chemical vanilla flavour is exceptionally unsavory, where as Pepsi's buttery mouth feel soon becomes too much. Overall, Pepsi clearly offers the better vanilla cola of the two, but you're better off choosing something else to drink.

official site

official site

Diet Coke Review

Diet Coke's can seems as if it's trying to utilize simplicity to create sophistication, however it fails and instead looks boring and corporate. The stylistic writing of the word "diet" further confirms evidence towards my opinion, and the uninspired font used to print "Coke" clashes with any potential elegance displayed otherwise. Is the general design iconic? Well, you could make that argument, but just because it's a classic doesn't mean it's actually any good.

Upon tasting the first sip, the explicit explanation as to why Diet Coke's has never been a personal favourite is bluntly experienced. The initial mouth feel is bland, with no citrus notes singing, and there aren't any real spicings to note. What is noticed is a obtuse vanilla that's shallow and bland, and it doesn't create any sort of creamy lushness. That's not to insinuate that the general flavour profile demands to taste dairy based, but it rather feels as if it's chemically fabricated instead of being naturally present. What the formulation does do solidly, though, is the acidity, which is strong, pronounced, and just feels right. Unfortunately, it's really the only component to the genre, as a lethal combination of a dominating metallic taste and the aforementioned chemical quality, detriment the chance of one objectively enjoying the actual taste, instead of drinking it out of habit or necessity. Saccharinity never ended up becoming much of a focal point during my testing, which is a good thing, I guess, as it means that the infamous artificial aftertaste doesn't greatly influence. Overall, with Diet Coke outselling every soda outside the regular sugared Coca-Cola in the US, one can't help but be disappointed.

Some know me for my love of caffeine, which is something that Diet Coke actually contains a decent helping of; forty six mg. Other than that, there's colouring, acids, water, "flavourings," and a preservative. Overall, Diet Coke itself isn't recommended, but all of its fans are recommended to try something different next time they reach for a beverage.

official site